“We’re tired of shouldering the burden of dragging this 200-year-old institution kicking and screaming into a more equitable age,” the letter stated. “We’re drained of being informed of the progress the corporate has made and being served platitudes about ‘diversity and inclusion’ after we elevate our considerations. We’re drained of seeing our phrases and photographs twisted to suit a story that doesn’t mirror our actuality. We’re drained of being informed to indicate each side of points there aren’t any two sides of.
The letter continued, “Things need to change.”
Ms. Hughes, the writer, stated on Saturday that administration would search internally and externally for Mr. Wischnowski’s substitute. Mr. Wischnowski declined to remark.
David Boardman, the chairman of the Lenfest Institute board and dean of Temple University’s Klein College of Media and Communication, stated in an emailed assertion, “What Stan was capable of accomplish as The Inquirer’s prime editor, by way of a tumultuous turnstile of house owners and publishers, has been exceptional.
“That said,” he added, “he leaves behind some decades-old, deep-seated and vitally important issues around diversity, equity and inclusion, issues that were not of his creation but that will likely benefit from a fresh approach.”
Board members of the Philadelphia Association of Black Journalists are scheduled to satisfy with leaders of The Inquirer subsequent week, stated the group’s vp, Ernest Owens, a author at giant at Philadelphia Magazine.
“The conversations and concerns we have are beyond just the headline,” Mr. Owens stated, including, “This is a majority of color city, and The Inquirer has fallen short when it comes to engaging the community at large.”
The discontent at The Inquirer got here throughout every week when greater than 800 staff of The New York Times signed a letter protesting the publication of an Op-Ed article by Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas, calling for a navy response to unrest in American cities.